:-)
Showing posts with label Conservativism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Conservativism. Show all posts
Sunday, January 31, 2016
Tuesday, January 5, 2016
Thursday, January 2, 2014
National Geographic Series: "The Decade That Made Us: The 80's"
Watching the National Geographic Series: "The Decade That Made Us: The 80's". When I think of the men who saved America, gave us our pride, our hope, made us proud to be American and a capitalist I think of and thank: Ronald Reagan, Bill Gates and yes JR Ewing.
Wednesday, March 27, 2013
Lunch
With all the nonsense that took place at the SCOTUS yesterday, going to Chick-fil-A for lunch.
Still true 20 years later...it's not just another lifestyle choice
Still true today after 20 years: “Bearing babies irresponsibly is simply wrong. Failing to support children one has fathered is wrong, and we must be unequivocal about this. It doesn’t help matters when prime-time TV has Murphy Brown, a character who supposedly epitomizes today’s intelligent, highly paid, professional woman, mocking the importance of fathers by bearing a child alone and calling it "just another lifestyle choice". I know it is not fashionable to talk about moral values, but . . . it’s time to make the discussion public.” - Dan Quayle
Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Wishing for 1930
"The report of proposed co-operation between the two parties in the Senate to pass appropriation bills at the coming short session of the Congress and prevent the necessity for a special session is welcome and encouraging news...The people want no agitation and no increased taxes." -- former President Coolidge, Nov 14, 1930
Monday, June 25, 2012
Supreme Court's ruling on AZ Immigration Law..."boggles the mind"
Very important from this morning's ruling from the Supreme Court on the AZ Law: Cite as: 567 U. S. ____ (2012) Opinion of SCALIA, J.
"... The President said at a news conference that the new program is “the right thing to do” in light of Congress’s failure to pass the Administra-tion’s proposed revision of the Immigration Act.7 Perhaps it is, though Arizona may not think so. But to say, as the Co...urt does, that Arizona contradicts federal law by enforc-ing applications of the Immigration Act that the President declines to enforce boggles the mind."
"..The Court opinion’s looming specter of inutterable hor-ror—“[i]f §3 of the Arizona statute were valid, every State could give itself independent authority to prosecute fed- eral registration violations,” ante, at 10—seems to me not so horrible and even less looming. But there has come to pass, and is with us today, the specter that Arizona and the States that support it predicted: A Federal Govern-ment that does not want to enforce the immigration laws as written, and leaves the States’ borders unprotected against immigrants whom those laws would exclude. So the issue is a stark one. Are the sovereign States at the mercy of the Federal Executive’s refusal to enforce the Nation’s immigration laws? A good way of answering that question is to ask: Would the States conceivably have entered into the Union if the Constitution itself contained the Court’s holding? Today’s judgment surely fails that test. At the Constitutional Convention of 1787, the delegates contended with “the jealousy of the states with regard to their sovereignty.” "
WOW.. Yet, we will see people vote to reelect Obama and Holder. That boggles the mind!
Read the actual ruling here: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/11-182b5e1.pdf
"... The President said at a news conference that the new program is “the right thing to do” in light of Congress’s failure to pass the Administra-tion’s proposed revision of the Immigration Act.7 Perhaps it is, though Arizona may not think so. But to say, as the Co...urt does, that Arizona contradicts federal law by enforc-ing applications of the Immigration Act that the President declines to enforce boggles the mind."
"..The Court opinion’s looming specter of inutterable hor-ror—“[i]f §3 of the Arizona statute were valid, every State could give itself independent authority to prosecute fed- eral registration violations,” ante, at 10—seems to me not so horrible and even less looming. But there has come to pass, and is with us today, the specter that Arizona and the States that support it predicted: A Federal Govern-ment that does not want to enforce the immigration laws as written, and leaves the States’ borders unprotected against immigrants whom those laws would exclude. So the issue is a stark one. Are the sovereign States at the mercy of the Federal Executive’s refusal to enforce the Nation’s immigration laws? A good way of answering that question is to ask: Would the States conceivably have entered into the Union if the Constitution itself contained the Court’s holding? Today’s judgment surely fails that test. At the Constitutional Convention of 1787, the delegates contended with “the jealousy of the states with regard to their sovereignty.” "
WOW.. Yet, we will see people vote to reelect Obama and Holder. That boggles the mind!
Read the actual ruling here: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/11-182b5e1.pdf
Tuesday, June 12, 2012
25 years ago Reagan tells Gorby to tear down a wall
"We welcome change and openness; for we believe that freedom and security go together, that the advance of human liberty can only strengthen the cause of world peace. There is one sign the Soviets can make that would be unmistakable, that would advance dramatically the cause of freedom and peace. General Secretary Gorbachev, if you seek peace, if you seek prosperity for the Soviet Union and eastern Europe, if you seek liberalization, come here to this gate. Mr. Gorbachev, open this gate. Mr. Gorbachev, Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!"
Friday, February 10, 2012
A very interesting interview....of with Bill Murray
Actor Bill Murray to CNBC: 'I think we ought to be personally responsible'
Sunday, January 22, 2012
Here we go again, the morning after a primary in SC
OK, first it's called a Primary for a reason. Thank about it. Second, screw what the Dems think at this point in the election about us. It's a Primary. Are you all too young to remember The 88 GOP election with Bush and Robertson? Bush and Buchannan? Or even Reagan and Ford?? It's a PRIMARY folks. By June well after Super Tuesday, the party will unite. Don't fall into the trap of what the Dem's think today, or some liberal on The Today show thinks tomorrow morning. Both Newt and Romeny are on message, hence look at how low Obama is polling. Now sit back and watch FL.
Saturday, November 5, 2011
A bruising campaign? A good process and we'll survive as we have in the past
To all my Republican friends worried about a bruising primary right now...are you all too young or not read history to recall Ford/Reagan, or Bush Sr. / Reagan, or Bush Sr. / Robertson?
Baker said then-Vice President George Bush was reluctant to take control of the White House while Reagan was in surgery because of it was early in Reagan's first term and Bush was still conscious of the hard-fought primary election he had lost to Reagan in 1980.
James Baker III recalls his White House years after serving Presidents Ford, Reagan and Bush
Baker said then-Vice President George Bush was reluctant to take control of the White House while Reagan was in surgery because of it was early in Reagan's first term and Bush was still conscious of the hard-fought primary election he had lost to Reagan in 1980.
James Baker III recalls his White House years after serving Presidents Ford, Reagan and Bush
Friday, September 2, 2011
I'm going with this ticket: Palin/Doyle aka Grant/Sherman..
Yes, this is it I'm going with this ticket: Palin/Doyle aka Grant/Sherman..
Monday, August 1, 2011
Debt Ceiling Debate
Overall, we won. I don't understand this living in world of absolutes by some of you. Everyone loves to invoke Reagan, well didn't he say he if you only got 75% of what you want, that's still a success? We won folks. No new taxes, cuts in spending. You know it's like here in MI last fall, we WON. We won the Governor's office, and both State House and State Senate and oh the Supreme Court, yet people are still bitching because they didn't get 100%. You people need to learn how to carry water for the elephant
Thursday, June 3, 2010
Sarah Palin: Extreme Enviros: Drill, Baby, Drill in ANWR – Now Do You Get It?
From Sarah Palin's Blog:
Yesterday at 3:17pm
This is a message to extreme “environmentalists” who hypocritically protest domestic energy production offshore and onshore. There is nothing “clean and green” about your efforts. Look, here’s the deal: when you lock up our land, you outsource jobs and opportunity away from America and into foreign countries that are making us beholden to them. Some of these countries don’t like America. Some of these countries don’t care for planet earth like we do – as evidenced by our stricter environmental standards.
With your nonsensical efforts to lock up safer drilling areas, all you’re doing is outsourcing energy development, which makes us more controlled by foreign countries, less safe, and less prosperous on a dirtier planet. Your hypocrisy is showing. You’re not preventing environmental hazards; you’re outsourcing them and making drilling more dangerous.
Extreme deep water drilling is not the preferred choice to meet our country’s energy needs, but your protests and lawsuits and lies about onshore and shallow water drilling have locked up safer areas. It’s catching up with you. The tragic, unprecedented deep water Gulf oil spill proves it.
We need permission to drill in safer areas, including the uninhabited arctic land of ANWR. It takes just a tiny footprint – equivalent to the size of LA’s airport – to tap America’s rich and plentiful oil and gas up north. ANWR’s drilling footprint is like a postage stamp on a football field.
But it’s not just ANWR; it’s our Petroleum Reserve, too. As Governor Sean Parnell noted today in the Wall Street Journal:
Radical environmentalists: you are damaging the planet with your efforts to lock up safer drilling areas. There’s nothing clean and green about your misguided, nonsensical radicalism, and Americans are on to you as we question your true motives.
- Sarah Palin
With your nonsensical efforts to lock up safer drilling areas, all you’re doing is outsourcing energy development, which makes us more controlled by foreign countries, less safe, and less prosperous on a dirtier planet. Your hypocrisy is showing. You’re not preventing environmental hazards; you’re outsourcing them and making drilling more dangerous.
Extreme deep water drilling is not the preferred choice to meet our country’s energy needs, but your protests and lawsuits and lies about onshore and shallow water drilling have locked up safer areas. It’s catching up with you. The tragic, unprecedented deep water Gulf oil spill proves it.
We need permission to drill in safer areas, including the uninhabited arctic land of ANWR. It takes just a tiny footprint – equivalent to the size of LA’s airport – to tap America’s rich and plentiful oil and gas up north. ANWR’s drilling footprint is like a postage stamp on a football field.
But it’s not just ANWR; it’s our Petroleum Reserve, too. As Governor Sean Parnell noted today in the Wall Street Journal:
“Federal agencies are also now blocking oil development in the National Petroleum Reserve—Alaska.
Although familiar with ANWR, most Americans are less likely to know about NPR-A and how vital it is to our energy security. Given recent developments, it’s time to elevate the position this area holds in our national discourse.
NPR-A, a 23 million acre stretch of Alaska’s North Slope, was set aside by President Warren Harding in 1923 for the specific purpose of supplying our country and military with oil and gas. Since 1976 it has been administered by the Department of the Interior, and since 1980 it has been theoretically open for development. The most recent estimates indicate that it holds 12 billion barrels of oil and 73 trillion cubic feet of natural gas.
In addition to containing enormous hydrocarbons, NPR-A is very close to the Trans-Alaska Pipeline, which means that there would be relatively little additional infrastructure needed to bring this new oil to our domestic market.
But even here, progress has been stalled.”
Radical environmentalists: you are damaging the planet with your efforts to lock up safer drilling areas. There’s nothing clean and green about your misguided, nonsensical radicalism, and Americans are on to you as we question your true motives.
- Sarah Palin
Thursday, April 15, 2010
Andrew Breitbart, Andrew Breitbart Townhall on USTREAM. Politics
Andrew Breitbart, Andrew Breitbart Townhall on USTREAM. Politics: "
Here is the link if the video doesn't load.
I removed the video because it would start automatically.
Here is the link if the video doesn't load.
I removed the video because it would start automatically.
Monday, October 5, 2009
Americans Must Fight Hostility to Christianity Growing in Schools
Great interview of former Speaker of the House Gingrich and his wife Callista:
A virulent hostility toward religion is threatening the very fabric of American liberty and prosperity: That's the alarm former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and his wife, Callista, are sounding in their thought-provoking new documentary, “Rediscovering God in America II: Our Heritage”.
Post of interview video:
And trailer:
Thursday, September 10, 2009
Why we don't heckle the President. No matter who.
"While Congress is the first branch named in the Constitution, the president is the commander-in-chief, the leader of the country, and in many unspoken ways treated as a king. We stand when the president enters the room, no matter who the president is. He has his own tune when he goes anywhere. When he gives a speech, his seal is on the lectern. The president is treated with royal respect, even though he is overtly not a royal. Ever since George Washington declined to become a king, we have established traditions that give the president all the kingly trappings."
No matter who is the President, current or former. You show respect. We have better ways to show dissent. People from both sides of the aisle are guilty of not showing this respect. We ALL need to show respect. I know people have yelled insults and boo'ed at George W. Bush. Lastnight's outburst is equally as wrong.
Friday, September 4, 2009
The Michigan Example
How government investment in business failed to create jobs.
"Despite all the giveaways, Michigan was recently ranked as having the third most antibusiness climate among states, in a survey of executives by CEO magazine. If Michigan had simply cut taxes for every business, as Mr. Engler did in the 1990s w...hen the state briefly led the nation in new jobs, it's a good bet unemployment would be lower."
"When Ms. Granholm gave her state of the state address earlier this year, she crowed about the similarities between the Michigan and Obama Administration strategies of using tax subsidies to aid favored businesses. "President Obama's priorities are nearly identical to ours," she declared, and we can only hope the results won't be"
Wednesday, August 19, 2009
'Closing in on Rove'
Why John Conyers, the New York Times and the Washington Post owe me an apology.
"Unfazed by facts and left with nothing to support their suspicions, the Times and Post editorial boards and Judiciary Democrats now seem to hope that special prosecutor Nora Dannehy, who is looking into the U.S. attorneys removals, will dig up something that implicates me. I am confident her findings will confirm that my actions were limited and proper. Perhaps then Judiciary Democrats will focus on more important issues and the Times and Post will admit their mistakes. It would be the responsible thing to do."
By the way, John Coneyrs is a thug. Just look at his wife.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
